Dear friends and family,
I’ve been back in New Orleans a little over a week. Yesterday the gas came
on, much to our delight. Tonight we’ll move into our rented place in Mid-City
and leave Lillie’s sister Jane in peace.
Yesterday we also managed to buy a replacement truck. Pickups (utes) are
hard to come by and very expensive at the moment, because everyone wants one to
fix up their place. Small trucks are particularly scarce, but we managed to
track one down on the West Bank (on the south side of the river) so I'm now the
proud driver of a red Mazda B2300. It has air conditioning and that's about the
end of the mod cons installed, but I love it already. And now we can offer it to
friends, family and neighbours to help with all the moving that’s going
on.
I’m coming down with a cold, despite my best efforts to avoid one, so I’ll
make this short. But I wanted to share the following editorial from Sunday’s New
York Times with you. It echoes many of my own sentiments and those of others
I’ve talked to since my return to New Orleans.
Love,
Rose
---------------------------
The New York Times
Editorial
Death of an American City
December 11, 2005
The New York Times
Editorial
Death of an American City
December 11, 2005
We are about to lose New Orleans. Whether it is a conscious plan to let the
city rot until no one is willing to move back or honest paralysis over difficult
questions, the moment is upon us when a major American city will die, leaving
nothing but a few shells for tourists to visit like a museum.
We said this wouldn't happen. President Bush said it wouldn't happen. He
stood in Jackson Square and said, "There is no way to imagine America without
New Orleans." But it has been over three months since Hurricane Katrina struck
and the city is in complete shambles.
There are many unanswered questions that will take years to work out, but
one is make-or-break and needs to be dealt with immediately. It all boils down
to the levee system. People will clear garbage, live in tents, work their
fingers to the bone to reclaim homes and lives, but not if they don't believe
they will be protected by more than patches to the same old system that failed
during the deadly storm. Homeowners, businesses and insurance companies all need
a commitment before they will stake their futures on the city.
At this moment the reconstruction is a rudderless ship. There is no
effective leadership that we can identify. How many people could even name the
president's liaison for the reconstruction effort, Donald Powell? Lawmakers need
to understand that for New Orleans the words "pending in Congress" are a death
warrant requiring no signature.
The rumbling from Washington that the proposed cost of better levees is too
much has grown louder. Pretending we are going to do the necessary work
eventually, while stalling until the next hurricane season is upon us, is
dishonest and cowardly. Unless some clear, quick commitments are made, the
displaced will have no choice but to sink roots in the alien communities where
they landed.
The price tag for protection against a Category 5 hurricane, which would
involve not just stronger and higher levees but also new drainage canals and
environmental restoration, would very likely run to well over $32 billion. That
is a lot of money. But that starting point represents just 1.2 percent of this
year's estimated $2.6 trillion in federal spending, which actually overstates
the case, since the cost would be spread over many years. And it is barely
one-third the cost of the $95 billion in tax cuts passed just last week by the
House of Representatives.
Total allocations for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the war on
terror have topped $300 billion. All that money has been appropriated as the
cost of protecting the nation from terrorist attacks. But what was the worst
possible case we fought to prevent?
Losing a major American city.
"We'll not just rebuild, we'll build higher and better," President Bush
said that night in September. Our feeling, strongly, is that he was right and
should keep to his word. We in New York remember well what it was like for the
country to rally around our city in a desperate hour. New York survived and has
flourished. New Orleans can too.
Of course, New Orleans's local and state officials must do their part as
well, and demonstrate the political and practical will to rebuild the city
efficiently and responsibly. They must, as quickly as possible, produce a
comprehensive plan for putting New Orleans back together. Which schools will be
rebuilt and which will be absorbed? Which neighborhoods will be shored up? Where
will the roads go? What about electricity and water lines? So far, local and
state officials have been derelict at producing anything that comes close to a
coherent plan. That is unacceptable.
The city must rise to the occasion. But it will not have that opportunity
without the levees, and only the office of the president is strong enough to
goad Congress to take swift action. Only his voice is loud enough to call people
home and convince them that commitments will be met.
Maybe America does not want to rebuild New Orleans. Maybe we have decided
that the deficits are too large and the money too scarce, and that it is better
just to look the other way until the city withers and disappears. If that is
truly the case, then it is incumbent on President Bush and Congress to admit it,
and organize a real plan to help the dislocated residents resettle into new
homes. The communities that opened their hearts to the Katrina refugees need to
know that their short-term act of charity has turned into a permanent
commitment.
If the rest of the nation has decided it is too expensive to give the
people of New Orleans a chance at renewal, we have to tell them so. We must tell
them we spent our rainy-day fund on a costly stalemate in Iraq, that we gave it
away in tax cuts for wealthy families and shareholders. We must tell them
America is too broke and too weak to rebuild one of its great cities.
Our nation would then look like a feeble giant indeed. But whether we admit
it or not, this is our choice to make. We decide whether New Orleans lives or
dies.

Comments